Which has a better scope and why: print and TV journalism or acting and anchoring?

manpreet Best Answer 2 years ago

I would say that print has a better scope because you get job security in the same in which you sit inside an office or you do TV journalism. TV journalism and anchoring has better scope. TV Correspondent or the TV News Anchor is a celebrity and there is no denying that most of the Media Graduates die for this profile only. There are fewer people who will ignore but most of them ask about the salary. This is also an assignment based job where a job may not be possible.

manpreet 2 years ago

Print in TV journalism has two domains that are related more to the traditional journalism.I would say that print has a better scope because you get job security in the same in which you sit inside an office or you do TV journalism. TV journalism and anchoring has better scope. TV Correspondent or the TV News Anchor is a celebrity and there is no denying that most of the Media Graduates die for this profile only. There are fewer people who will ignore but most of them ask about the salary. This is also an assignment based job where a job may not be possible. Acting and Anchoring shall happen once the students know how to SPEAK on Stage. To make an announcement we may not need active teachers but the active people know when and how to speak are called the Anchors. Acting is the act of Role Play or performing the fictional characters. Better Scope lies with the TV and Print Journalism because once you get out to do these things you get recognition.