Kindly log in to use this feature. We’ll take you to the login page automatically.
LoginCourse Queries Syllabus Queries 3 years ago
User submissions are the sole responsibility of contributors, with TuteeHUB disclaiming liability for accuracy, copyrights, or consequences of use; content is for informational purposes only and not professional advice.
No matter what stage you're at in your education or career, TuteeHUB will help you reach the next level that you're aiming for. Simply,Choose a subject/topic and get started in self-paced practice sessions to improve your knowledge and scores.
Kindly log in to use this feature. We’ll take you to the login page automatically.
LoginReady to take your education and career to the next level? Register today and join our growing community of learners and professionals.
Your experience on this site will be improved by allowing cookies. Read Cookie Policy
Your experience on this site will be improved by allowing cookies. Read Cookie Policy
manpreet
Best Answer
3 years ago
Fascist ideologies are almost always defined as traditionalist, in terms of nationalism and religion.
Would a political ideology that involved the fascist-style authoritarianism and collectivism but did not rely on the traditionalist concept of nationalism and religion (e.g., was secular) and invented its own definition of collective independently of traditional ethnicity, still be considered fascism? Or would that be considered communism?