Complete lattices on Q and R ordered by ≤ Ask

Course Queries Syllabus Queries 3 years ago

943 2 0 0 0

User submissions are the sole responsibility of contributors, with TuteeHUB disclaiming liability for accuracy, copyrights, or consequences of use; content is for informational purposes only and not professional advice.

Answers (2)

Post Answer
profilepic.png
manpreet Tuteehub forum best answer Best Answer 3 years ago

To quote from my lecture notes:

When every subset of A has a lub and glb, we say that the order is a complete lattice, but this takes us beyond the syllabus. It is notable that QQ, ordered by , is not a complete lattice but RR, ordered by , is a complete lattice. This is the fundamental difference between QQ and RR.

Please can someone explain why this is true? I can't see what the lub of RR would be, in the same way I can't see a lub for QQ.

0 views
0 shares

profilepic.png
manpreet 3 years ago

The book is mistaken; for instance, A=RRA=R⊆R has no g.l.b. or l.u.b. in RR, so RR is not a complete lattice. However, Rˆ=R{,}R^=R∪{−∞,∞} is a complete lattice, where we declare <r<−∞<r<∞ for all rRr∈R.

But even this modification doesn't help in the case of Qˆ=Q{,}Q^=Q∪{−∞,∞}.

Consider the set

A={xQ:x2>2}QˆA={x∈Q:x2>2}⊆Q^

Does it have a g.l.b. in 

0 views   0 shares

No matter what stage you're at in your education or career, TuteeHUB will help you reach the next level that you're aiming for. Simply,Choose a subject/topic and get started in self-paced practice sessions to improve your knowledge and scores.

Similar Forum