For each A, ∫A0tα−1e−tdt exists by continuity of the integrand. If we show that ∫BAtα−1e−tdt→0as B>A→∞ we can conclude that the improper integral exists. To show this, note that et2≥tkk!for any positive integer k hence tα−1e−t
Embark on a journey of knowledge! Take the quiz and earn valuable credits.
Take A QuizChallenge yourself and boost your learning! Start the quiz now to earn credits.
Take A QuizUnlock your potential! Begin the quiz, answer questions, and accumulate credits along the way.
Take A QuizCourse Queries Syllabus Queries 3 years ago
User submissions are the sole responsibility of contributors, with TuteeHUB disclaiming liability for accuracy, copyrights, or consequences of use; content is for informational purposes only and not professional advice.
For each AA, ∫A0tα−1e−tdt∫0Atα−1e−tdt exists by continuity of the integrand. If we show that ∫BAtα−1e−tdt→0∫ABtα−1e−tdt→0as B>A→∞B>A→∞ we can conclude that the improper integral exists. To show this, note that et2≥tkk!et2≥tkk!for any positive integer kk hence tα−1e−t
No matter what stage you're at in your education or career, TuteeHUB will help you reach the next level that you're aiming for. Simply,Choose a subject/topic and get started in self-paced practice sessions to improve your knowledge and scores.
Ready to take your education and career to the next level? Register today and join our growing community of learners and professionals.
Your experience on this site will be improved by allowing cookies. Read Cookie Policy
Your experience on this site will be improved by allowing cookies. Read Cookie Policy
manpreet
Best Answer
3 years ago
In my complex analysis textbook it states that the following integral converges
∫∞1tα−1e−tdt∫1∞tα−1e−tdt
where αα is some real number such that α>1α>1
Also, it seems that t→tα−1e−tt→tα−1e−t is taken to be a real valued function of a real variable.
This integral appears in a demonstration of using a certain theorem. In the statement of the theorem, it states
"... and there exists a continuous non-negative h:[0,∞)→[0,∞)h:[0,∞)→[0,∞) such that the integral ∫∞0h(t)dt∫0∞h(t)dtconverges and ..." (Translated from Hebrew).
Is there more than one definition of convergence that could be applied to this? I do not think that my textbook previously defined such an (improper?) integral, so it may be a definition from "Calculus II" (Israeli Syllabus)
In the "most basic" or "most likely" sense of convergence, how can it be shown that this integral does in href="https://forum.tuteehub.com/tag/fact">fact converge?
Thanks!
(Note: I tagged the question with "improper-integrals", but this should not be taken to imply that this it is assumed that this is the definition the author meant)