Embark on a journey of knowledge! Take the quiz and earn valuable credits.
Take A QuizChallenge yourself and boost your learning! Start the quiz now to earn credits.
Take A QuizUnlock your potential! Begin the quiz, answer questions, and accumulate credits along the way.
Take A QuizKindly log in to use this feature. We’ll take you to the login page automatically.
LoginGeneral Tech Bugs & Fixes 3 years ago
User submissions are the sole responsibility of contributors, with TuteeHUB disclaiming liability for accuracy, copyrights, or consequences of use; content is for informational purposes only and not professional advice.
No, because db.GetCollection defines the collection as strongly typed objects which the driver will process in combination with any further logic that is carried out (using linq or otherwise).
Your best options would be either:
Define a class which is compatible with your Mongo Collection in your own code, then use that class to deserialise your results db.GetCollection which you can then use with your linq query above to select just the ids.
Just use the default BsonDocument to define your collection and use a projection: db.GetCollection
No matter what stage you're at in your education or career, TuteeHUB will help you reach the next level that you're aiming for. Simply,Choose a subject/topic and get started in self-paced practice sessions to improve your knowledge and scores.
Kindly log in to use this feature. We’ll take you to the login page automatically.
LoginReady to take your education and career to the next level? Register today and join our growing community of learners and professionals.
Your experience on this site will be improved by allowing cookies. Read Cookie Policy
Your experience on this site will be improved by allowing cookies. Read Cookie Policy
manpreet
Best Answer
3 years ago
Whenever I am trying to get a list of Ids from a collection:
I am getting a cast error:
I am not able to modify the definition of a class, because its implemented in a package I can't change. Therefore the solution of putting:
on it, is not possible. Based on this.
Is it possible to cast this in the Linq query?