Kindly log in to use this feature. We’ll take you to the login page automatically.
LoginGeneral Tech Bugs & Fixes 3 years ago
User submissions are the sole responsibility of contributors, with TuteeHUB disclaiming liability for accuracy, copyrights, or consequences of use; content is for informational purposes only and not professional advice.
No matter what stage you're at in your education or career, TuteeHUB will help you reach the next level that you're aiming for. Simply,Choose a subject/topic and get started in self-paced practice sessions to improve your knowledge and scores.
Kindly log in to use this feature. We’ll take you to the login page automatically.
LoginReady to take your education and career to the next level? Register today and join our growing community of learners and professionals.
Your experience on this site will be improved by allowing cookies. Read Cookie Policy
Your experience on this site will be improved by allowing cookies. Read Cookie Policy
manpreet
Best Answer
3 years ago
Currently dealing with some legacy code that defines a macro'ed function and uses the macro param to stamp out a C-style cast and a look up table (array) - note they're all just enums
What I would like to do is pass the enum & array as template parameters so I don't have to alter the function signature as follows:
And then use a simpler macro definition to lay out the function declaration:
But this results in a compilation error
I'm not entirely sure if my approach is feasible here or if there's a simpler approach that would be more appropriate? If it is a reasonable approach I'm not sure what is missing to allow this to compile?