I don't know what you mean by safe, but it is common practice. The caller of the function becomes responsible for freeing the returned object:
var
s : TStringList;
begin
s := GetStringList;
// stuff
s.free;
end;
Embark on a journey of knowledge! Take the quiz and earn valuable credits.
Take A QuizChallenge yourself and boost your learning! Start the quiz now to earn credits.
Take A QuizUnlock your potential! Begin the quiz, answer questions, and accumulate credits along the way.
Take A QuizKindly log in to use this feature. We’ll take you to the login page automatically.
LoginGeneral Tech Learning Aids/Tools 3 years ago
User submissions are the sole responsibility of contributors, with TuteeHUB disclaiming liability for accuracy, copyrights, or consequences of use; content is for informational purposes only and not professional advice.
No matter what stage you're at in your education or career, TuteeHUB will help you reach the next level that you're aiming for. Simply,Choose a subject/topic and get started in self-paced practice sessions to improve your knowledge and scores.
Kindly log in to use this feature. We’ll take you to the login page automatically.
LoginReady to take your education and career to the next level? Register today and join our growing community of learners and professionals.
Your experience on this site will be improved by allowing cookies. Read Cookie Policy
Your experience on this site will be improved by allowing cookies. Read Cookie Policy
manpreet
Best Answer
3 years ago
Here I provide simple piece of code.
And now the question: what will happen to result object in function GetStringList:Tstringlist, which is created, but never freed? (I call 2 times Create and only 1 time Free) Is it memory safe to provide objects by function or should I use procedures to do this task, where object creation and destroying is simply handled (procedure ProvideStringlist)? I call 2 times Create and 2 times Free. Or is there another solution?
Thanx in advance
Lyborko