I don't know what you mean by safe, but it is common practice. The caller of the function becomes responsible for freeing the returned object:
var
s : TStringList;
begin
s := GetStringList;
// stuff
s.free;
end;
Embark on a journey of knowledge! Take the quiz and earn valuable credits.
Take A QuizChallenge yourself and boost your learning! Start the quiz now to earn credits.
Take A QuizUnlock your potential! Begin the quiz, answer questions, and accumulate credits along the way.
Take A QuizGeneral Tech Learning Aids/Tools 2 years ago
Posted on 16 Aug 2022, this text provides information on Learning Aids/Tools related to General Tech. Please note that while accuracy is prioritized, the data presented might not be entirely correct or up-to-date. This information is offered for general knowledge and informational purposes only, and should not be considered as a substitute for professional advice.
No matter what stage you're at in your education or career, TuteeHub will help you reach the next level that you're aiming for. Simply,Choose a subject/topic and get started in self-paced practice sessions to improve your knowledge and scores.
General Tech 10 Answers
General Tech 7 Answers
General Tech 3 Answers
General Tech 9 Answers
Ready to take your education and career to the next level? Register today and join our growing community of learners and professionals.
manpreet
Best Answer
2 years ago
Here I provide simple piece of code.
And now the question: what will happen to result object in function GetStringList:Tstringlist, which is created, but never freed? (I call 2 times Create and only 1 time Free) Is it memory safe to provide objects by function or should I use procedures to do this task, where object creation and destroying is simply handled (procedure ProvideStringlist)? I call 2 times Create and 2 times Free. Or is there another solution?
Thanx in advance
Lyborko