Please allow ads on our site
Loginproof for relational predicate logic
General Tech Learning Aids/Tools 3 years ago
User submissions are the sole responsibility of contributors, with TuteeHUB disclaiming liability for accuracy, copyrights, or consequences of use; content is for informational purposes only and not professional advice.
No matter what stage you're at in your education or career, TuteeHUB will help you reach the next level that you're aiming for. Simply,Choose a subject/topic and get started in self-paced practice sessions to improve your knowledge and scores.
Similar Forum
Explore Other Libraries
Online Exams
Question Bank
Career News
Feeds
Full Forms
Dictionary
Interview Question
Gigs
Quotes
Lyrics
Videos
Courses
Blogs
Tutorials
Forum
Educators
Corporates
Tools
manpreet![Tuteehub forum best answer]()
Best Answer
3 years ago
I have been working on this problem for over an hour and I think I have simply missed something. I need some help. The rules I am allowed to use are the Basic Inference rules (MP, MT, HS, Simp, Conj, DS, Add, CD), the Replacement Rules (DN, Comm, Assoc, Dup, DeM, BE, Contrap, CE, Exp, Dist.), CP, IP, and EI, UI, EG, UG.
The problem is:
/∴ ¬(Aea ∧ Cfc)
Any help would be appreciated. Thanks.
Edit: Fixed the format of the question. The system is quantificational predicate logic. I've never called it anything else.