Embark on a journey of knowledge! Take the quiz and earn valuable credits.
Take A QuizChallenge yourself and boost your learning! Start the quiz now to earn credits.
Take A QuizUnlock your potential! Begin the quiz, answer questions, and accumulate credits along the way.
Take A QuizKindly log in to use this feature. We’ll take you to the login page automatically.
LoginGeneral Tech Learning Aids/Tools 3 years ago
User submissions are the sole responsibility of contributors, with TuteeHUB disclaiming liability for accuracy, copyrights, or consequences of use; content is for informational purposes only and not professional advice.
No matter what stage you're at in your education or career, TuteeHUB will help you reach the next level that you're aiming for. Simply,Choose a subject/topic and get started in self-paced practice sessions to improve your knowledge and scores.
Kindly log in to use this feature. We’ll take you to the login page automatically.
Login
Ready to take your education and career to the next level? Register today and join our growing community of learners and professionals.
Your experience on this site will be improved by allowing cookies. Read Cookie Policy
Your experience on this site will be improved by allowing cookies. Read Cookie Policy
manpreet
Best Answer
3 years ago
In other contexts, I'm used to "binding" inferring bidirectional movement of the data to/from the object. Put in other terms, we could call the movement of data from an object to a html form 'serialization' and the reverse, 'deserialization'. However model binders and value providers, seems only responsible for populating an object from an http request - the deserializing part. What part of the pipeline is responsible for taking data from the object and serializing it to the form or other http response? Or does it simply stop with the 'Html.TextBoxFor' utility?
I beleive I could create a custom InputExtension but that seems overkill - the default does most of what I need except for when it grabs the value for a property. I could also create a different model but that is also something I'm trying to avoid.
Is there an extensibility point where I could manage the value extraction from the model to the html input?