Speak now
Please Wait Image Converting Into Text...
Embark on a journey of knowledge! Take the quiz and earn valuable credits.
Challenge yourself and boost your learning! Start the quiz now to earn credits.
Unlock your potential! Begin the quiz, answer questions, and accumulate credits along the way.
General Tech QA/Testing 2 years ago
Posted on 16 Aug 2022, this text provides information on QA/Testing related to General Tech. Please note that while accuracy is prioritized, the data presented might not be entirely correct or up-to-date. This information is offered for general knowledge and informational purposes only, and should not be considered as a substitute for professional advice.
Turn Your Knowledge into Earnings.
Visual Studio allows unit testing of private methods via an automatically generated accessor class. I have written a test of a private method that compiles successfully, but it fails at runtime. A fairly minimal version of the code and the test is:
//in project MyProj class TypeA { private List<TypeB> myList = new List<TypeB>(); private class TypeB { public TypeB() { } } public TypeA() { } private void MyFunc() { //processing of myList that changes state of instance } } //in project TestMyProj public void MyFuncTest() { TypeA_Accessor target = new TypeA_Accessor(); //following line is the one that throws exception target.myList.Add(new TypeA_Accessor.TypeB()); target.MyFunc(); //check changed state of target }
The runtime error is:
Object of type System.Collections.Generic.List`1[MyProj.TypeA.TypeA_Accessor+TypeB]' cannot be converted to type 'System.Collections.Generic.List`1[MyProj.TypeA.TypeA+TypeB]'.
According to intellisense - and hence I guess the compiler - target is of type TypeA_Accessor. But at runtime it is of type TypeA, and hence the list add fails.
Is there any way I can stop this error? Or, perhaps more likely, what other advice do other people have (I predict maybe "don't test private methods" and "don't have unit tests manipulate the state of objects").
Yes, don't Test private methods.... The idea of a unit test is to test the unit by its public 'API'.
If you are finding you need to test a lot of private behavior, most likely you have a new 'class' hiding within the class you are trying to test, extract it and test it by its public interface.
One piece of advice / Thinking tool..... There is an idea that no method should ever be private. Meaning all methods should live on a public interface of an object.... if you feel you need to make it private, it most likely lives on another object.
This piece of advice doesn't quite work out in practice, but its mostly good advice, and often it will push people to decompose their objects into smaller objects.
No matter what stage you're at in your education or career, TuteeHub will help you reach the next level that you're aiming for. Simply,Choose a subject/topic and get started in self-paced practice sessions to improve your knowledge and scores.
General Tech 9 Answers
General Tech 7 Answers
General Tech 3 Answers
General Tech 2 Answers
Ready to take your education and career to the next level? Register today and join our growing community of learners and professionals.