Embark on a journey of knowledge! Take the quiz and earn valuable credits.
Take A QuizChallenge yourself and boost your learning! Start the quiz now to earn credits.
Take A QuizUnlock your potential! Begin the quiz, answer questions, and accumulate credits along the way.
Take A QuizGeneral Tech QA/Testing 2 years ago
Posted on 16 Aug 2022, this text provides information on QA/Testing related to General Tech. Please note that while accuracy is prioritized, the data presented might not be entirely correct or up-to-date. This information is offered for general knowledge and informational purposes only, and should not be considered as a substitute for professional advice.
No matter what stage you're at in your education or career, TuteeHub will help you reach the next level that you're aiming for. Simply,Choose a subject/topic and get started in self-paced practice sessions to improve your knowledge and scores.
General Tech 10 Answers
General Tech 7 Answers
General Tech 3 Answers
General Tech 9 Answers
Is Foldable Smartphone Technology the Future or Just a Trend?
Ready to take your education and career to the next level? Register today and join our growing community of learners and professionals.
manpreet
Best Answer
2 years ago
I generated two matrices of
1000
x1000
:First Matrix:
O
and#
.Second Matrix:
O
andB
.Using the following code, the first matrix took 8.52 seconds to complete:
With this code, the second matrix took 259.152 seconds to complete:
What is the reason behind the dramatically different run times?
As suggested in the comments, printing only
System.out.print("#");
takes7.8871
seconds, whereasSystem.out.print("B");
givesstill printing...
.As others who pointed out that it works for them normally, I tried Ideone.com for instance, and both pieces of code execute at the same speed.
Test Conditions:
System.nanoTime()
for measurements