Embark on a journey of knowledge! Take the quiz and earn valuable credits.
Take A QuizChallenge yourself and boost your learning! Start the quiz now to earn credits.
Take A QuizUnlock your potential! Begin the quiz, answer questions, and accumulate credits along the way.
Take A QuizPlease log in to access this content. You will be redirected to the login page shortly.
LoginGeneral Tech QA/Testing 2 years ago
Posted on 16 Aug 2022, this text provides information on QA/Testing related to General Tech. Please note that while accuracy is prioritized, the data presented might not be entirely correct or up-to-date. This information is offered for general knowledge and informational purposes only, and should not be considered as a substitute for professional advice.
No matter what stage you're at in your education or career, TuteeHUB will help you reach the next level that you're aiming for. Simply,Choose a subject/topic and get started in self-paced practice sessions to improve your knowledge and scores.
Please log in to access this content. You will be redirected to the login page shortly.
LoginReady to take your education and career to the next level? Register today and join our growing community of learners and professionals.
manpreet
Best Answer
2 years ago
I generated two matrices of
1000
x1000
:First Matrix:
O
and#
.Second Matrix:
O
andB
.Using the following code, the first matrix took 8.52 seconds to complete:
With this code, the second matrix took 259.152 seconds to complete:
What is the reason behind the dramatically different run times?
As suggested in the comments, printing only
System.out.print("#");
takes7.8871
seconds, whereasSystem.out.print("B");
givesstill printing...
.As others who pointed out that it works for them normally, I tried Ideone.com for instance, and both pieces of code execute at the same speed.
Test Conditions:
System.nanoTime()
for measurements