Embark on a journey of knowledge! Take the quiz and earn valuable credits.
Take A QuizChallenge yourself and boost your learning! Start the quiz now to earn credits.
Take A QuizUnlock your potential! Begin the quiz, answer questions, and accumulate credits along the way.
Take A QuizKindly log in to use this feature. We’ll take you to the login page automatically.
LoginGeneral Tech QA/Testing 3 years ago
User submissions are the sole responsibility of contributors, with TuteeHUB disclaiming liability for accuracy, copyrights, or consequences of use; content is for informational purposes only and not professional advice.
No matter what stage you're at in your education or career, TuteeHUB will help you reach the next level that you're aiming for. Simply,Choose a subject/topic and get started in self-paced practice sessions to improve your knowledge and scores.
Kindly log in to use this feature. We’ll take you to the login page automatically.
LoginReady to take your education and career to the next level? Register today and join our growing community of learners and professionals.
Your experience on this site will be improved by allowing cookies. Read Cookie Policy
Your experience on this site will be improved by allowing cookies. Read Cookie Policy
manpreet
Best Answer
3 years ago
I generated two matrices of
1000x1000:First Matrix:
Oand#.Second Matrix:
OandB.Using the following code, the first matrix took 8.52 seconds to complete:
With this code, the second matrix took 259.152 seconds to complete:
What is the reason behind the dramatically different run times?
As suggested in the comments, printing only
System.out.print("#");takes7.8871seconds, whereasSystem.out.print("B");givesstill printing....As others who pointed out that it works for them normally, I tried Ideone.com for instance, and both pieces of code execute at the same speed.
Test Conditions:
System.nanoTime()for measurements