Please allow ads on our site
Kindly log in to use this feature. We’ll take you to the login page automatically.
LoginWhy sometimes exhaustive testing is easier than pairwise testing?
General Tech QA/Testing 3 years ago
User submissions are the sole responsibility of contributors, with TuteeHUB disclaiming liability for accuracy, copyrights, or consequences of use; content is for informational purposes only and not professional advice.
No matter what stage you're at in your education or career, TuteeHUB will help you reach the next level that you're aiming for. Simply,Choose a subject/topic and get started in self-paced practice sessions to improve your knowledge and scores.
Similar Forum
Explore Other Libraries
Online Exams
Question Bank
Career News
Feeds
Full Forms
Dictionary
Interview Question
Gigs
Quotes
Lyrics
Videos
Courses
Blogs
Tutorials
Forum
Educators
Corporates
Tools
Please allow ads on our site
Kindly log in to use this feature. We’ll take you to the login page automatically.
Login
manpreet![Tuteehub forum best answer]()
Best Answer
3 years ago
Consider a function with 4 parameters, each with 2 options = 16 combinations testing ALL possible combinations. But 24 with pairwise testing - how come? It would be hence more difficult to test pairs (which does not reveal - in context of software testing - problems caused by interaction of 3 variables) than ALL combinations.
Or the advantage is that with covering or orthogonal arrays, these pairs can be arranged so that fewer runs are needed?