Embark on a journey of knowledge! Take the quiz and earn valuable credits.
Take A QuizChallenge yourself and boost your learning! Start the quiz now to earn credits.
Take A QuizUnlock your potential! Begin the quiz, answer questions, and accumulate credits along the way.
Take A QuizPlease log in to access this content. You will be redirected to the login page shortly.
LoginGovernmental Miscellaneous in Governmental 10 months ago
In the United States of America, the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) authorizes the payment of attorney's fees to a prevailing party in an action against the United States absent a showing by the government that its position in the underlying litigation "was substantially justified". The Act is codified in scattered sections of the United States Code:
5 U. S. C. § 504 provides that an agency that conducts an adversary adjudication against a prevailing party (as "party" is defined) shall pay the fees and expenses of the party, unless the adjudicative officer of the agency finds that the position of the agency was substantially justified. "Adversary adjudication" is defined as a formal trial-type ex parte proceeding in which the agency is adverse to the party, and governed by 5 U. S. C. § 554 "trial type" proceedings, as opposed to an inter partes proceeding in which the agency adjudicates a dispute between two parties, or the less-formal proceedings of § 555.28 U. S. C. §2412 provides that the agency shall pay attorney fees of a prevailing party in a court case against the agency, unless the court finds that the agency position was substantially justified.Each is subject to multiple conditions. Section 2412(d)(1) for court fees requires:
a short time deadline after the favorable final judgment (see Time for Filing), including a statement of "the amount sought, including an itemized statement from any attorney ... stating the actual time expended and the rate" charged.a showing that the applicant is a "prevailing party"a showing that the applicant is "eligible to receive an award"a limit on the net worth of the party (see Net worth)an allegation that "the position of the United States was not substantially justified" (see Substantial Justification and Special Circumstances and Scarborough v. Principi, 124 S. Ct. 1856, 2004). referenceFull Form | Category |
---|---|
Eastern Africa Journalists Association | Business |
Equal Access to Justice Act | Governmental |
Posted on 01 Dec 2024, this text provides information on Governmental related to Miscellaneous in Governmental. Please note that while accuracy is prioritized, the data presented might not be entirely correct or up-to-date. This information is offered for general knowledge and informational purposes only, and should not be considered as a substitute for professional advice.
Turn Your Knowledge into Earnings.
No matter what stage you're at in your education or career, TuteeHub will help you reach the next level that you're aiming for. Simply,Choose a subject/topic and get started in self-paced practice sessions to improve your knowledge and scores.
Ready to take your education and career to the next level? Register today and join our growing community of learners and professionals.