Speak now
Please Wait Image Converting Into Text...
Embark on a journey of knowledge! Take the quiz and earn valuable credits.
Challenge yourself and boost your learning! Start the quiz now to earn credits.
Unlock your potential! Begin the quiz, answer questions, and accumulate credits along the way.
Interviews General Queries 2 years ago
Posted on 16 Aug 2022, this text provides information on General Queries related to Interviews. Please note that while accuracy is prioritized, the data presented might not be entirely correct or up-to-date. This information is offered for general knowledge and informational purposes only, and should not be considered as a substitute for professional advice.
Turn Your Knowledge into Earnings.
I work at a small company where we pay 100% of employees' health insurance premiums. The cost can vary dramatically depending on whether an employee waives coverage, wants individual coverage, or has a spouse and children they want on the plan. An individual on the plan might cost us ~$5k/year and a family ~$20k.
This means a dramatic difference in the net cost and benefits of similar employees at similar roles and pay grades. For example, if an employee is offered $80K as a salary, an employee who waived coverage will make $80K, while someone with a totally insured family will cost the company $100K - a 25% difference. What's a viable way to mitigate that discrepancy?
How do others deal with compensation offers given that the health insurance costs for employees can vary so much? Do you just determine the salary assuming the employee would use the most expensive insurance coverage (potentially weakening the offer you could make to an employee who didn't want so much coverage)? How have others solved this?
Note: I don't think switching to a system where employees pick up some of the health insurance premium solves this problem, since those who consumed more health insurance would still get a greater benefit as someone with the same salary but needing less coverage.
Some companies require employees to pay some of the cost of health insurance. In those cases the company contribution can be held consistent for all employees. But you've eliminated this option.
Another way to address the perceived imbalance is to use a "cafeteria plan" for benefits. Employees get a fixed amount of benefit; they can "spend" that on family health care or on a 401(k) match or on tuition remission or something else. You pitch that as allowing each employee to craft the benefits plan that meets his needs. Right now it can seem unfair to your single employees that others get the same salary plus extra insurance; it may also seem unfair to those who don't participate in the 401(k) plan that others get a company contribution, and ditto for those who use or don't use other benefits.
Transitioning to a cafeteria plan from a no-limits package like you have now can be tricky, though -- you'll have to either add benefits or get flack from people who are now losing what you used to fully cover.
No matter what stage you're at in your education or career, TuteeHub will help you reach the next level that you're aiming for. Simply,Choose a subject/topic and get started in self-paced practice sessions to improve your knowledge and scores.
Interviews 2 Answers
Interviews 5 Answers
Interviews 3 Answers
Ready to take your education and career to the next level? Register today and join our growing community of learners and professionals.