Solve : Biochip Implant May Kill.?

This is off topic. Thais is about RFID chips placed under human skin.
First item has video. Look:

RFID implanted Chip that Kills you if you disobey-NBC predicting RFID implants for all Americans by 2017 ?

The Mark: Scientist Claims Human Microchip Implants Will Become “Not Optional”

Study Finds 1 in 3 Americans Have Been Implanted With RFID Chips:

The Truth Behind the Obamacare RFID Implant Myth (Obamacare Version)

Yes, these are old stories now. From 2013 onward.
My question is: Why is there no more information on this topic?
Those links are clearly for some conspiracy theory sites, if you insist on linking news articles, please do so from reputable sources. Surely the fact that you can't find any evidence in other places indicates that the information on those links is obviously made up... Fair replay. Some are say in it will kill you. That is rather extreme. People with Guns ALREADY do that all the time. More likely, the implant will put you in JAIL. But resisting arrest could kill you i too.
Now did you sees this?
Quote

...following Wisconsin and North Dakota, California issued Senate Bill 362 in 2007, which prohibits employers and others from forcing anyone to have a RFID device implanted under their skin.
On April 5, 2010, Georgia, Atlanta, Senate passed Senate Bill 235 that prohibits forced microchip implants in humans and that would make it a misdemeanor for anyone to require them, including employers.

So some people in Congress do not like the idea.
However, the medical arguments against the device are based on evidence, not hysterical. The FDA has strict rules about what you implant in human tissue.

Aside from the political implications --
Is this really the next evolution in technology?
Don't we already have enough ways to ID people?
Would it hurt to have more?
Please provide relevant links. Just throwing this out there - We already do this exact same thing to dogs and cats and I'm not aware of any problems with those injuring animals when they come too close to a magnetic source or whatever those tinfoil hat people claim. They are also passive RFID devices, the range is extremely short usually less than a metre.The News Editor position at CH is still open...only qualified applicants will be considered...Quote from: Geek-9pm on April 05, 2015, 04:37:53 PM

However, the medical arguments against the device are based on evidence, not hysterical.

No they aren't. Your sources here are hardly any more reputable than the sources you used to present a very similar topic already.

-Infowars, for EXAMPLE, has claimed repeatedly that the Boston Bombing was a "false flag" attack; that the U.S government effectively perpetrated it. You can guess what other terrorist event they claim was perpetrated the same way. I won't even bother giving them the extra traffic; their "evidence" consists of people wearing back-packs. No, I'm not making that up. People wore backpacks near the finish line, therefore, government conspiracy. A bunch of idiot nutjobs whose inability to present even a basic, logically sound argument is apparently the only qualification they needed.

-SHTF is a "Survivalist" website. These are websites created by individuals who believe the apocalypse is coming and who stockpile guns, ammo, and food to prepare for the coming "Doomsday". These individuals are more often than not also incapable of climbing stairs without having to catch their breath, so it is probably a good thing for their survival that their ludicrous scenario is not going to play out, since if it did I don't think "unable to climb stairs without breaking a sweat" would prevent their skull from being used as a soup bowl. Needless to say, their articles are generally WRITTEN with a rather strongly biased perspective and tend to ignore when their own sources are garbage. usually they just invent nonsense or spin real information to fabricate their own ridiculous plotline.

-the "National Report" story looks credible, or, it would, if the National Report didn't also have articles such as "IRS set to target leprechauns next". Another big issue is that their source, "Wyoming Institute of technology" doesn't exist, and is a satire website. This should be fairly clear given that they are the source of the "studies" for National Report articles such as Solar panels drain the sun's energy as well as having the honourable distinction, as they show on their About page, of creating the first organic artificial nose for Michael Jackson as well as:

Quote

In December of 1999, WIT literally saved the world, after our computer science researchers managed to stop the Y2K virus from spreading globally. The Y2K virus would have caused airplanes to fall from the sky, the stock market to crash, cars to stop functioning, cell phones to randomly dial strangers, and more. WIT’s tireless work led to several WIT researchers being awarded a Nobel Peace Prize in 2000, and Presidential Medals of Freedom in both 2000 and 2001.

In fact, all their pages have pretty obvious hints the entire site is satirical.


Ranks right up there with the Onion...Quote from: camerongray on April 06, 2015, 08:41:10 AM

Just throwing this out there - We already do this exact same thing to dogs and cats and I'm not aware of any problems with those injuring animals when they come too close to a magnetic source or whatever those tinfoil hat people claim. They are also passive RFID devices, the range is extremely short usually less than a metre.

Yes, you got that right. Short range passive tags that are in people's pets.

When the story first came out, some did claim it is part of a big-brother plan to track everybody and punish those who stray too far.
Reportedly some German inventor tried to get patent of RFID that could kill somebody on command. I think the patent was denied, because the intention of the device was not justifiable. There are other ways to punish criminals,. And in most jurisdiction capital punishment limits how and where execution takes place. Exceptions are in Warfare and Military rule.

Now could a device kill you by some freak accident? There are two real concerns. First the the case of allergic reaction of the body to a foreign object. The second is contamination from germs that might attach to the device while it was injected.the.. It was documented, but is not a real problem.

Of greater concern is the amount of information about travel habits. One can imagine that upon arrival at a overseas airport, a check would be made as to your medical history. This information could also be used to track the movements of frequent flyers, presumably to see if t hey might be involved is subversive activities.

Like you said, the mas media used this a a means to grab your attention. The sad thing is that it was broadcast by NBC here in the USA and, to o my knowledge, no retraction was made.

Recently, last month, somebody picked up that NBC story and repeated the general content. See here:

NBC Report Predicts RFID Chips To Be Widely Used In Humans By 2017



At the bottom of the page you will find the video clip of the 2008 NBC story.
EDIT: NBC did not say it will kill you. Another site made the claim and linked to the NBC story to support the idea.
RFID implanted Chip that Kills you if you disobey-NBC predicting RFID implants for all Americans by 2017 ?
That headline makes it sound like NBC said that.
Please look at the link above. It goes way way beyond d what NBC said. you are linking to and reading posts that are...

sensational nonsense. The effort if just going through your links and showing why they are full of crap is a full-time job.

Take the "Anonhq" article. Again- another conspiracy theory haven- this site also has articles talking about how Obama has been "proven" to be Kenyan, How 9/11 was a false flag, and how aliens are controlling the government and world religions in order to plan an invasion. (No, I am not making that up).

My point? These sites are not reputable sources. Just read the article you linked. It uses the following segment of a bill that passed:

Quote

The SECRETARY shall establish a national medical device registry (in this subsection referred to as the 11 ‘registry’) to facilitate analysis of post-market safety and 12 outcomes data on each device that— ‘‘(A) is or has been used in or on a patient; and ‘‘(B) is— ‘‘(i) a class III device; or ‘‘(ii) a class II device that is implantable, 17 life-supporting, or life-sustaining.

Fair enough- a national registry for medical devices for analyzing their safety for implantation and whether they perform life-sustaining functions. Seems reasonable to regulate the industry creating said devices, and we certainly wouldn't want to have microchip pacemakers being implanted that were cheap chinese knock-offs.

But no. Apparently that passage "proves" that the intended use is to "serve as the ultimate form of surveillance and subjugation.". Oh, look- how convenient that their conclusion fits so neatly with the wildly atrophied worldview that they seem to have. Shame it is entirely unsupported by the oft-cited NBC video.

Quote

Like you said, the mas media used this a a means to grab your attention. The sad thing is that it was broadcast by NBC here in the USA and, to o my knowledge, no retraction was made.

No "retraction" is necessary, because it was NOT broadcast by NBC; the video linked is a NBC broadcast from 2007, and it suggests that microchips might be used in the future to record a person's medical data in case of emergency. It does not suggest that it will be used to track travel habits or anything involving an overseas airport, most of it just babbles about existing implementations of things like fingerprint identification and iris scanning.

The health concerns with allergic reactions and foreign objects are no different with any implant of this form than with already common devices such as pacemakers.