General Tech Technology & Software 2 years ago
Posted on 16 Aug 2022, this text provides information on Technology & Software related to General Tech. Please note that while accuracy is prioritized, the data presented might not be entirely correct or up-to-date. This information is offered for general knowledge and informational purposes only, and should not be considered as a substitute for professional advice.
I think intervention is a superfluous, unneeded word.
I don't like the phrase "used to" in this context; I think it reads awkwardly. I would change it so the simple past (a la Mark Hubbard's comment), or use the word would.
I agree with the commenters; people have been using technology for a long time. The printing press was a technological marvel in its day.
With those three points in mind, here's my recommended edit:
In the past, people would communicate without modern technology.
No matter what stage you're at in your education or career, TuteeHub will help you reach the next level that you're aiming for. Simply,Choose a subject/topic and get started in self-paced practice sessions to improve your knowledge and scores.
General Tech 10 Answers
General Tech 7 Answers
General Tech 3 Answers
General Tech 9 Answers
manpreet![Tuteehub forum best answer]()
Best Answer
2 years ago
I'm writing an essay for my English class. It's about technology and what the world was like before many modern inventions.
I want to say in the past, people used to communicate without the intervention of technology, is communicate naturally a good candidate? I really doubt it though I want to sound brief and natural. What do you suggest?
Edit: The comments made me aware that I should be more specific. I mean the abscence of electronic/electric devices. As mentioned in comments communicating through smoke, ink, ravens, and also face-to-face communication. Is there an umbrella term or expression for these? Something like primitive/primary communication maybe!
Thanks