Linear Mixed Model for evaluation of students

General Tech Technology & Software . 2 years ago

  0   1   0   0   0 tuteeHUB earn credit +10 pts

5 Star Rating 5 Rating

Posted on 16 Aug 2022, this text provides information on Technology & Software related to General Tech. Please note that while accuracy is prioritized, the data presented might not be entirely correct or up-to-date. This information is offered for general knowledge and informational purposes only, and should not be considered as a substitute for professional advice.

Take Quiz To Earn Credits!

Turn Your Knowledge into Earnings.

tuteehub_quiz

Write Your Comments or Explanations to Help Others



Tuteehub forum answer Answers (1)


profilepic.png
manpreet Tuteehub forum best answer Best Answer 2 years ago

 

My dataset about students (n=74) contains one outcome variable (exam points/integer) and eight predictor variables:

2 categorical:

  • gender [F,M]
  • study years [1,2,3]

6 continuous variables:

  • age [in years/integer]
  • work experience [in years/integer]
  • technology experience [score/double]
  • technology usage [score/double]
  • technology success [score/integer]
  • technology acceptance [score/integer])

These variables have been measured on the same students throughout the study year (some variables at the beginning, some during, and some at the end of the study year). Now I want to check the relationships between these variables, especially with regards to the outcome variable.

It was recommended to go ahead (thanks @COOLSerdash) with a linear mixed model (R package: lme4). So I have been digging into linear mixed models, and I am struggling a bit with crossed vs. nested random effects. As I am understanding it now, my data should be modeled as crossed and nested. Currently, my dataset is as follows:

  • 74 students have each a single response to 8 variables (gender, study years, age, work experience, technology experience, technology usage, technology success, technology acceptance), thus I would follow a crossed design as responses are clustered within students:

    (1|gender/study years/age/work experience/technology experience/technology usage/technology success/technology acceptance)

Question 1): Does it make sense to add demographic details (gender, age, study years, work experience) following a crossed design? Where to best account for effects of gender, age, study years, work experience, technology experience?

  • But there is also a nesting of the data, such as: female students (group 1) nest into female students with low technology usage (group 2) thus I would model (1|group1)+(1|group2). However, then I could have many nestings (female: low usage, mid usage, high usage; female: low technology acceptance, mid technology acceptance, high technology acceptance).

Question 2): What do I have to put in my model to account for the 8 variables that is the effect of gender, study years, age, work experience, technology experience, technology usage, technology success and technology acceptance on the exam performance (outcome variable)?

0 views   0 shares

No matter what stage you're at in your education or career, TuteeHub will help you reach the next level that you're aiming for. Simply,Choose a subject/topic and get started in self-paced practice sessions to improve your knowledge and scores.

tuteehub community

Join Our Community Today

Ready to take your education and career to the next level? Register today and join our growing community of learners and professionals.

tuteehub community